This One's For Ken... From the Guardian: Can you trust Wikipedia?
Generally, I actually find most of the criticism to be pretty inconsequential and academically snobbish; granted, I wouldn't base my thesis on a Wiki article, but basically the 'experts' in this article concede that factually it is mostly accurate, and then scramble for vague reasons why it is still 'bad' (including my favourite: "It doesn't list my book in the bibliography").
Also, given that 12-year-old boys can pick out errors in Encyclopaedia Britannica, I think the pithy attack by its former editor is pretty rich.
2 comments The question I am left with is:
Did they bother correcting it? Or did they just scoff, complain, and then turn away?
It seems like Wikipedia can only get better, and having actual experts put a little care into it would be useful.
| |
Gil, what would they get out of it? It's hard to hold a wine and cheese about such things... | |
|
|
|
|
Vorg — Tag Cloud
Written by goodladd Latest PhotoQuote of Now:FriendsPopular PostsComputer Games
|