For the technological audience Caspar Melville of opendemocracy.net writes:
"This is all part of the shift from mass media to personalized media," says Paul Saffo, a technology forecaster and director of the Institute of the Future. No doubt this is true, but is it, I wonder, a good thing? For all the cachet and control implied by the iPod, the laptop, the Blackberry, the digital camera, and wi-fi, in the end what seems to be on offer are particular kinds of distraction and avoidance, and a peculiar kind of 21st-century digital loneliness.
-- Via Utne (July/August 2005) from the New Humanist (March/April 2005)
3 comments I'm on my computer now and the guy in the apartment across the alley is working on his computer. I feel, however, that we're somehow connected. I think it's because he keeps burping loudly. | |
I think it's a natural use of technology to try and customize your input/output to personal tastes. Television has long been a one-way medium with a very limited control exerted by the audience. Given a choice between control and none, people will go with control at every turn.
The real danger, in my mind, is surrounding yourself with only like-minds so that you develop a skewed view of popular views. People tend to gravitate to those with whom they already agree and with personal control over your social input/output you can create for yourself an insular and self-reinforcing bubble of reality that has little reflection of the diverse views of the population. | |
|
|
|
|
Vorg — Tag Cloud
Written by Mirzipan Latest PhotoQuote of Now:FriendsPopular PostsComputer Games
|